Factors Associated with Clinical Outcomes in Spontaneous Subarachnoid Hemorrhage
PDF
Cite
Share
Request
Original Investigation
P: 124-129
December 2022

Factors Associated with Clinical Outcomes in Spontaneous Subarachnoid Hemorrhage

J Acad Res Med 2022;12(3):124-129
1. University of Health Sciences Turkey, Gaziosmanpaşa Training and Research Hospital, Clinic of Neurosurgery, Istanbul, Turkey
No information available.
No information available
Received Date: 13.06.2022
Accepted Date: 04.10.2022
Publish Date: 26.12.2022
PDF
Cite
Share
Request

ABSTRACT

Conclusion:

In our study, the effects of early surgery, WFNS, and HHS scores on clinical outcome in cerebral aneurysmatic SAH were shown.

Results:

Forty-four patients who met the criteria were included in the study. The mean age of the patients was 49.1±10.3 (minimum-maximum: 29-77). Of those, 54.5% were females while 45.5% were males. Comorbidity was present in 54.5% of the patients. The most common aneurysm was the middle cerebral artery aneurysm with the rate of 27.3%. Of the aneurysmal SAHs, 45.5% were treated with microsurgical clipping and 27.3% with endovascular treatment. A statistically significant correlation was found between GOSE score and timing of treatment days (p=0.014), WFNS (p=0.002) and HHS scores (p<0.001). No statistically significant correlation was found between GOSE score and patient’s age (p=0.47) and Fisher scale score (p=0.465).

Methods:

The charts and 6th month outpatient clinic records of the patients who were treated with the diagnosis of SAH between 2016 and 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Post-discharge clinical status, adaptation to life, and disability status of 44 patients with aneurysmal SAH who were treated with endovascular or microsurgical techniques in our clinic were evaluated with the Glasgow Outcome Scale Extended (GOSE). The relationship between the patient’s age, gender, timing of treatment, the location of the aneurysm, the World Federation of Neurological Surgeons (WFNS) scale score, Hunt-Hess scale (HHS) score, Fisher scale score and preoperative evaluations that might affect the GOSE score after discharge were examined.

Objective:

This study aims at evaluating the factors affecting prognosis in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH).

Keywords:
Spontaneous subarachnoid hematoma
prognosis
clinical outcomes

INTRODUCTION

Cerebral aneurysms (CA) occur in 3-5% of the general population (1). Aneurysm rupture causes subarachroid hemorrhage (SAH) and is associated with high mortality and morbidity (2). Its formation and pathophysiology have not been fully defined (3). Current treatment options consist of endovascular treatment and microsurgical clipping. Despite advances in surgical and endovascular techniques, equipment diversity in devices, and the improvements in intensive care units, mortality and morbidity associated with aneurysm rupture remain high (4). Treating ruptured aneurysms is required. The type of treatment is decided according to the choice of patients, the size and site of aneurysm. However, at vascular centers with a high annual number of microsurgical clipping, there is a tendency to perform clipping rather than applying endovascular treatment (5). Although the results of the International Study of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms and International Subarachnoid Aneurysm studies point to “coil first” with endovascular surgical intervention, there are ongoing discussions regarding the superiority of endovascular treatment and microsurgical clipping treatment over each other and which one should be preferred (6,7).

The Glasgow outcome scale-extended (GOSE) is used in the treatment of SAH and in the short and long-term follow-ups and results of these treatments, as in other cranial pathologies with brain injury (8,9). Many studies in the literature evaluate clinical outcome with GOSE. Correlation of applied treatment parameters and neurological status with GOSE is examined (8,9). Recently, some studies claimed that early aneurysm treatment achieves better clinical outcomes (8,10). There are also studies showing poor clinical outcomes in patients with WFNS grade IV and V SAH (9). There are few studies comparing GOSE score with preoperative parameters in SAH. No study was found in which all the mentioned parameters were compared with GOSE score.

In this study, we planned to investigate the effects of preoperative parameters and treatments in spontaneous SAH on clinical outcome.

METHODS

The data of 44 patients who developed SAH due to CA rupture and were admitted to our clinic and were treated between 2016-2020 were analysed retrospectively. The patients with spontaneous SAH who were admitted to our hospital within 72 hours after bleeding were included in the study. The patients with non-spontaneous SAH and those with previous record of neurological diseases (cerebrovascular disease, neurodegenerative diseases, etc.) were excluded from the study. All data of the patients were collected from the hospital database. Data were collected in the following categories: patient age, gender, World Federation of Neurological Surgeons (WFNS) scale score (Table 1) (11), Hunt-Hess scale (HHS) score (Table 2) (12), Fisher scale score (Table 3) (12), the site of aneurysm, the type of treatment performed (microsurgical clipping/endovascular treatment) and the number of days between first bleeding and application of treatment. In addition, the patients’ adaptation to life and disability status were evaluated with the (GOSE) score (Table 4) (13) at the 6th month after discharge. Cerebral computed tomography (CT), cerebral CT angiography and Digital Subtraction Angiography (DSA) were performed in all patients after admission to the hospital. Control DSA was also performed in the patients at the 6th month.

Table 1
Table 2
Table 3
Table 4

The patients were treated by a single surgeon experienced in vascular surgery. They were operated with micro-Doppler and neuromonitoring.

Single or multiple aneurysm clips (Sugita®, Mizuho, ​​Tokyo, Japan) were used during surgery. Endovascular treatment was performed by experienced senior neuroradiologists. Diagnostic or therapeutic angiography was performed with a routine femoral approach using biplane angio-graphic system with a flat panel detector (Toshiba Infinix, Toshiba Medical, Nasu, Japan). Lesions were treated with coils (Boston Scientific Corp., Natick, MA, USA) and stent (Neuroform® Stent System, Boston Scientific Corp., Natick, MA, USA).

All procedures were carried out in accordance with the 1964 Helsinki declaration. Written informed consent for scientific purposes and clinical data collection were obtained from patients according to institutional protocol. Ethical approval was obtained from the local ethics committee (approval no: 319, date: 22.09.2021).

Statistical Analysis

The Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) 25.0 was used for statistical analysis (SPSS Inc.; Chicago, IL, USA). The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was used to examine the normal distribution. According to results of normality analyses, the data was not normally distributed. The descriptive statistical methods (frequency, percentage, mean, standard deviation) were used to evaluate the demographic data. Pearson’s chi-square test was used to compare the qualitative data. The Spearman correlation analysis was used for analysing the association of the quantitative data. The results were evaluated at a confidence interval of 95% and a significance level of p<0.05.

RESULTS

The total number of patients who were admitted to the clinic with the diagnosis of CA and underwent treatment between 2016 and 2020 was 44. The characteristic features of the patients are given in Table 5. Their mean age was 49.1±10.3 (minimum-maximum: 29-77). Of them 54.5% were females while 45.5% were males. Comorbidity was present in 54.5% of the patients. The three most common comorbidities were hypertension (HT) (45.5%), asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. WFNS scale, HHS and Fisher scale scores ​​of the patients are shown in Table 6. The most common values for each scale were as follows: For WFNS scale score “Grade 1” in18 (40.9%) patients, for HHS score “1” in 18 (40.9%) patients, and for Fisher score “3” in 17 (38.6%) patients.

Table 5
Table 6

The angiography results of the patients with SAH were as follows: Twelve (27.3%) had middle cerebral artery (MCA) aneurysm, 8 (18.2%) anterior communicating artery (AcoA) aneurysm, 4 (9.1%) internal carotid artery aneurysm, 3 (6.8%) posterior communicating artery aneurysm, 2 (4.5%) distal anterior cerebral artery aneurysm, 2 (4.5%) posterior inferior cerebellar artery aneurysm, 1 (2.3%) basilar artery type aneurysm (Figure 1). Twelve (27.3%) patients were angiography negative. Except for these 12 patients, 20 (45.5%) patients were treated with microsurgical clipping and 12 (27.3%) patients with endovascular treatment, making the total number of treated patients 32. The mean number of days between bleeding and application of microsurgical clipping or endovascular treatment after SAH was 1.2, with the first day and the fifth day of bleeding representing the minimum and maximum values, respectively.

Figure 1

The study found a statistically significant negative correlation between GOSE score ​​and timing of treatment (p=0.014) and a moderate significant negative correlation between GOSE and WFNS scale (p=0.002) and HHS scores (p<0.001) (Table 7). The overall mortality rate of the patients at the 6-month follow-up was 11.3%.

Table 7

DISCUSSION

Nearly half of the SAH cases are caused by CA (14). Studies on predicting the prognosis of patients after SAH and the risk factors that affect the treatment outcome are still pending (15). In our current study, a negative correlation was found between WFNS scale and HHS scores, which were the preoperative evaluation scales, the GOSE score, and the timing of treatment applied.

In this study, 27.3% of the 44 patients with SAH were found to have negative angiogram. When compared with the literature this rate is high. In the literature, angiogram negative SAHs constitute approximately 10-20% of spontaneous SAHs (16,17). It also has the same negative clinical outcomes as aneurysmal SAH (16,17). In line with the literature, GOSE scores of patients with angiogram negative SAH and aneurysmal SAH are similar. It is thought that the frequency of angiogram negative SAHs has increased, and this may be related to the widespread use of antiplatelet drugs (18).

Complications after SAH (vasospasm, ischemic neurological deficit, and brain infarction) are closely related to age and gender (19). While the incidence of complications is lower in elderly patients, they occur more commonly among the younger patients (20). It has been stated that 30-39 age group has higher risk whereas 60-69 age group has significantly lower risk (19). In addition, there are studies showing that the females are at higher risk of experiencing SAH and its complications (19,21). Our study, however, found no significant gender (p=0.395) or age (p=0.119) related difference among our patients in terms of risks. Although the studies in the literature generally state that age and gender are important risk factors, there are also articles with findings concurring that of our study (22).

HT is accepted as a risk factor for aneurysm formation and rupture (23). Laboratory studies have shown that a link exists between cerebral aneurysm and HT (24). Our study also found that HT was the most important morbidity accompanying SAH.

The most common site for aneurysm was MCA. In the literature, however, the most common site for aneurysm is ACoA which is the type of aneurysm with the highest rate of mortality and morbidity (3). The mortality rate we found in our study (11.7%) was unaffected by the site of aneurysm. We think that this differentiation may be related to the sample size of our study (n=44).

Discussions on the timing of surgery continue and varying views have been put forward about this issue thus far (25-27). However, in our study, we found a statistically significant relationship between the timing of surgery and GOSE score (p=0.014): The earlier the surgery was performed, the higher the patient’s GOSE values ​​and the lower the mortality and morbidity were.

A strongly negative correlation was found between the HHS and GOSE scores ​​of the patients (p<0.001). As HHS score increased, survival rate decreased significantly. We think that it gives a very significant information about the prognosis. Past studies also support our findings (27-30). For example, studies conducted with 100 patients with SAH in 2001, with 3567 patients with SAH in 2007, with 720 patients with SAH in 2020, as well as some other studies conducted with many patients revealed the relationship between HHS score and prognosis (31-33). Like HHS score, WFNS scale score was also found to have a statistically significant relationship with GOSE score (p=0.002). As WFNS scale score increased, GOSE score ​​decreased. A look at the literature shows that the findings about WFNS scale score and patient prognosis are compatible with our results (31-36).

In the literature comparing clinical outcome and preoperative parameters, fewer parameters were examined than in our study. We determined that all parameters such as age, gender, day of surgery, HHS, WFNS Scale and Fisher scale scores, and aneurysm localization were not considered.

In our study, it was seen that the findings related to age and gender were not compatible with the literature. Findings on the day of surgery and WFNS scale score were consistent with the literature. Findings on HHS and Fisher scale scores supported the literature.

Study Limitations

The limitations of the study were that it was conducted in a single center, it was retrospective, and the number of patients was low. The low number of patients caused underpowered statistical analysis. Consequently, further comparative, long-term studies with larger patient groups are necessary to confirm these findings.

CONCLUSION

We suggest that WFNS scale and HHS scores of patients with aneurysmal SAH and timing of treatment provide important information about their GOSE scores and thereby the prognosis. Age, gender, comorbidities of the patients and the site of aneurysm did not make a significant contribution to the prognosis of the patients. Identifying and analysing the risk factors in studies with larger sample sizes will contribute to the literature. Conducting the study with a larger patient series will yield more reliable results.

Ethics Committee Approval: Ethical approval was obtained from the University of Health Sciences Turkey, Gaziosmanpaşa Training and Research Hospital Clinical Research Ethics Committee (approval no: 319, date: 22.09.2021).

Informed Consent: Written informed consent for scientific purposes and clinical data collection were obtained from patients according to institutional protocol.

Peer-review: Externally and internally peer-reviewed.

Author Contributions: Surgical and Medical Practices - Ö.Ö.; Concept - Ö.Ö., F.D.; Design - Ö.Ö., O.B.; Data Collection and/or Processing - Ö.Ö., B.B.; Analysis and/or Interpretation - Ö.Ö., S.K.; Literature Search - Ö.Ö.; Writing - Ö.Ö., S.K.

Conflict of Interest: The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

Financial Disclosure: The authors declared that this study has received no financial support.

References

1
Brisman JL, Song JK, Newell DW. Cerebral aneurysms. N Engl J Med 2006; 355: 928-39.
2
Ingall TJ, Whisnant JP, Wiebers DO, O’Fallon WM. Has there been a decline in subarachnoid hemorrhage mortality? Stroke 1989; 20: 718-24.
3
Brinjikji W, Zhu YQ, Lanzino G, Cloft HJ, Murad MH, Wang Z, et al. Risk Factors for Growth of Intracranial Aneurysms: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2016; 37: 615-20.
4
Rincon F, Rossenwasser RH, Dumont A. The epidemiology of admissions of nontraumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage in the United States. Neurosurgery 2013; 73: 217-22; discussion 212-3.
5
Bradac O, Hide S, Mendelow DA, Benes V. Aneurysm treatment in Europe 2010: an internet survey. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2012; 154: 971-8; discussion 977-8.
6
Wiebers DO, Whisnant JP, Huston J 3rd, Meissner I, Brown RD Jr, Piepgras DG, et al. Unruptured intracranial aneurysms: natural history, clinical outcome, and risks of surgical and endovascular treatment. Lancet 2003; 362: 103-10.
7
Molyneux A, Kerr R, Stratton I, Sandercock P, Clarke M, Shrimpton J, et al. International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised trial. Lancet 2002; 360: 1267-74.
8
Taylor CJ, Robertson F, Brealey D, O’shea F, Stephen T, Brew S, et al. Outcome in poor grade subarachnoid hemorrhage patients treated with acute endovascular coiling of aneurysms and aggressive intensive care. Neurocrit Care 2011; 14: 341-7.
9
Seule M, Oswald D, Muroi C, Brandi G, Keller E. Outcome, Return to Work and Health-Related Costs After Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage. Neurocrit Care 2020; 33: 49-57.
10
Schwartz C, Pfefferkorn T, Ebrahimi C, Ottomeyer C, Fesl G, Bender A, et al. Long-term Neurological Outcome and Quality of Life after World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies Grades IV and V Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage in an Interdisciplinary Treatment Concept. Neurosurgery 2017; 80: 967-74.
11
Rosen DS, Macdonald RL. Subarachnoid hemorrhage grading scales: a systematic review. Neurocrit Care 2005; 2: 110-8.
12
Oshiro EM, Walter KA, Piantadosi S, Witham TF, Tamargo RJ. A new subarachnoid hemorrhage grading system based on the Glasgow Coma Scale: a comparison with the Hunt and Hess and World Federation of Neurological Surgeons Scales in a clinical series. Neurosurgery 1997;41:140-7; discussion 147-8.
13
Wilson JT, Pettigrew LE, Teasdale GM. Structured interviews for the Glasgow Outcome Scale and the extended Glasgow Outcome Scale: guidelines for their use. J Neurotrauma 1998; 15: 573-85.
14
de Rooij NK, Linn FH, van der Plas JA, Algra A, Rinkel GJ. Incidence of subarachnoid haemorrhage: a systematic review with emphasis on region, age, gender and time trends. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2007; 78: 1365-72.
15
Roganović Z, Pavlićević G. Factors influencing the outcome after the operative treatment of cerebral aneurysms of anterior circulation. Vojnosanit Pregl 2002; 59: 463-71.
16
Cánovas D, Gil A, Jato M, de Miquel M, Rubio F. Clinical outcome of spontaneous non-aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage in 108 patients. Eur J Neurol 2012; 19: 457-61.
17
Fontanella M, Rainero I, Panciani PP, Schatlo B, Benevello C, Garbossa D, et al. follow-up. Neurosurg Rev 2011; 34: 477-84.
18
Ellis JA, McDowell MM, Mayer SA, Lavine SD, Meyers PM, Connolly ES Jr. The role of antiplatelet medications in angiogram-negative subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neurosurgery 2014; 75: 530-5; discussion 534-5.
19
Malinova V, Schatlo B, Voit M, Suntheim P, Rohde V, Mielke D. Identification of specific age groups with a high risk for developing cerebral vasospasm after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neurosurg Rev 2016; 39: 429-36.
20
Kale SP, Edgell RC, Alshekhlee A, Borhani Haghighi A, Sweeny J, Felton J, et al. Age-associated vasospasm in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2013; 22: 22-7.
21
Knekt P, Reunanen A, Aho K, Heliövaara M, Rissanen A, Aromaa A, et al. Risk factors for subarachnoid hemorrhage in a longitudinal population study. J Clin Epidemiol 1991; 44: 933-9.
22
Lindbohm JV, Kaprio J, Jousilahti P, Salomaa V, Korja M. Sex, Smoking, and Risk for Subarachnoid Hemorrhage. Stroke 2016; 47: 1975-81.
23
Connolly ES Jr, Rabinstein AA, Carhuapoma JR, Derdeyn CP, Dion J, Higashida RT, et al. Guidelines for the management of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/american Stroke Association. Stroke 2012; 43: 1711-37.
24
Morimoto M, Miyamoto S, Mizoguchi A, Kume N, Kita T, Hashimoto N. Mouse model of cerebral aneurysm: experimental induction by renal hypertension and local hemodynamic changes. Stroke 2002; 33: 1911-5.
25
Kassell NF, Torner JC, Haley EC Jr, Jane JA, Adams HP, Kongable GL. The International Cooperative Study on the Timing of Aneurysm Surgery. Part 1: Overall management results. J Neurosurg 1990; 73: 18-36.
26
Torner JC, Kassell NF, Wallace RB, Adams HP Jr. Preoperative prognostic factors for rebleeding and survival in aneurysm patients receiving antifibrinolytic therapy: report of the Cooperative Aneurysm Study. Neurosurgery 1981; 9: 506-13.
27
Niskanen MM, Hernesniemi JA, Vapalahti MP, Kari A. One-year outcome in early aneurysm surgery: prediction of outcome. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1993; 123: 25-32.
28
Bansal M, Mittal RS. Clinical Demographic Association and Outcome in Patients with Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage. Indian Journal of Neurosurgery 2015; 4: 63-8.
29
Bhat AR, Afzalwani M, Kirmani AR. Subarachnoid hemorrhage in Kashmir: Causes, risk factors, and outcome. Asian J Neurosurg 2011; 6: 57-71.
30
Sodhi HB, Savardekar AR, Mohindra S, Chhabra R, Gupta V, Gupta SK. The clinical profile, management, and overall outcome of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage at the neurosurgical unit of a tertiary care center in India. J Neurosci Rural Pract 2014; 5: 118-26.
31
Bonilha L, Marques EL, Carelli EF, Fernandes YB, Cardoso AC, Maldaum MV, et al. Risk factors and outcome in 100 patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Arq Neuropsiquiatr 2001; 59: 676-80.
32
Rosengart AJ, Schultheiss KE, Tolentino J, Macdonald RL. Prognostic factors for outcome in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Stroke 2007; 38: 2315-21.
33
Chen YB, Wang Z, Zhou D, Zhang SM, Yu ZQ, Chen G. [Analysis of prognosis and risk factors of 730 patients with anterior communicating aneurysm]. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi 2020; 100: 3515-9. Chinese.
34
Aydın Y, Halit Çavuşoğlu H. Subarachnoid hemorrhage. Med Bull Sisli Etfal Hosp 2007; 41: 7-16.
35
Uysal E, Kırdar Ö, Özel A, Ertürk ŞM, Yıldırım H, Caymaz I, et al. Ecstasy use complicating with ICA dissection; A case report. Med Bull Sisli Etfal Hosp 2008; 42: 23-5.
36
Uysal E, Ulusay SM, Civelek Ş, Başak M. Combined endovascular and surgery treatment for neck and head paragangliomas. Med Bull Sisli Etfal Hosp 2010; 44: 27-31.